Albuquerque Journal
Sunday, September 17, 2006
What Is a Year of Life Worth?
By David Roybal
For the Journal
Wrongly convicted and imprisoned only to be found innocent later: It's
not a common occurrence, not at all common in New Mexico.
But imagine yourself at the center of it the next time it happens—
because it will happen again. What is a year of your freedom worth?
It's a question columnist Steve Chapman asked recently in the Chicago
Tribune while writing of an Illinois man who served 27 years in prison for
a rape and murder conviction before being declared innocent and freed two
years ago.
“It's hard to envision a more nightmarish experience," Chapman wrote.
The state of Illinois paid the freed man $162,000 in compensation. It
breaks down to $6,000 for each year that he was wrongly imprisoned, or $17
a day.
Chapman's column was cited in The Week magazine. It said other states
are even stingier when it comes to compensating people who are sentenced
to prison and then found to be innocent later. There's a cap of $25,000
for such people in Wisconsin, $20,000 in New Hampshire. Montana offers
only tuition, room and board at any of its community colleges.
Reportedly, 29 states are without legal provision for compensation in
such cases.
New Mexico is among them, said prominent Santa Fe defense lawyers Mark
Donatelli, Steven Farber and Robert Rothstein.
All three were involved in freeing an innocent man who was sent to
prison after a 1973 conviction in Hobbs. Terry Seaton, who came to New
Mexico from California and had worked as an Air Force technician at Cannon
Air Force Base, was convicted of killing a Carlsbad baker. The baker was
castrated, and cooking oil was poured over him before his body was burned.
“It was a heinous crime," Farber said last week.
But Seaton didn't commit it. He couldn't have, even though he was
sentenced to life in prison for the crime. “We proved he was elsewhere,"
Farber said.
Farber and Rothstein showed that Seaton, then in his early 20s, was
committing a burglary of a men's clothing store in Clovis and couldn't
have made it to Carlsbad in time to commit the baker's murder.
Investigations by Farber, Rothstein and Donatelli pointed to another
man, and they turned up what amounted to a taped confession that
purportedly exonerated Seaton. Seaton passed a polygraph test in which he
denied having committed the killing. The prosecution's key witness failed
a polygraph test.
Neither the taped confession nor the polygraph results were disclosed
by the prosecution during the trial that led to Seaton's conviction,
Rothstein said.
“We proved that his detention was illegal and that his rights to due
process were violated because the prosecution failed to provide
exculpatory information," Farber said.
State District Judge George Perez in Sandoval County ordered Seaton
released after several days of testimony. U.S. District Judge Howard
Bratton later presided over a federal civil rights case in Las Cruces
through which Seaton was awarded about $120,000. It amounted to about
$17,000 for each year that Seaton was wrongly imprisoned, and it was an
award that didn't come automatically; it had to be won for Seaton in court
by proving that his civil rights had been denied.
After it all, Seaton studied for a while at the University of New
Mexico Law School before moving to San Diego. Farber hooked up with him a
few years ago after being approached by students studying criminal justice
and political science at New Mexico State University.
The students looked at the Seaton case and approached Farber for help.
“We spoke with (Seaton) on the phone. He had suffered a stroke and was not
working at the time because of impairment," Farber said.
Rothstein said the man who confessed to the Carlsbad baker's murder
was never prosecuted. He was sent to a mental institution instead.
Cases like Seaton's are not to be confused with others like the one of
59-year-old Ralph Rodney Earnest, who was released this month after
spending 24 years in prison in connection with a 1982 Carlsbad slaying.
Earnest's release was secured after a co-defendant who apparently
implicated Earnest in a recorded statement refused to testify at his
retrial.
Earnest has not been proved innocent, not yet at least. It's just that
the state apparently didn't feel it could convict him again under legal
rulings not applied in the original trial.
Farber, for one, thinks legislation that would compensate people found
to be innocent after having been wrongly imprisoned should be pursued, no
matter that such occurrences are rare.
“It's important for the times that it does occur," Farber said.
What's a fair amount?
Farber is not sure.
“A year of lost freedom is priceless. How can you ever replace that
amount of time with what happens to you in prison?" he asked.
Seems we ought to at least make an effort at compensation, even if
civil rights were not violated and even if the people wronged aren't
always Boy Scouts.
David Roybal can be reached at (505) 351-4053. |